DEMOS
Halberda, J. (2006). Is this a dax which I see before me? Use of the logical argument disjunctive syllogism supports word-learning in children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 53(4), 310-344.
Download the paper 
Experiment 4: Preschoolers
Trial structure and results were similar for children and adults. Only movies of children are shown here. For movies of adult participants and to see how frame-by-frame figures are made click here.
Known Label Trials
Target-Fixated Known Label Trials
 |
On target-fixated known label trials, children happened to be fixating the known target (door) at the time of label onset (“door”). In general, children continued fixating this target and pointed without double-checking the distractor (cup).

|
Distractor-Fixated Known Label Trials
 |
On distractor-fixated known label trials, children happened to be fixating the distractor object (pot) at the time of known label onset (“bed”). Children quickly shifted gaze to the target and pointed to the target.

|
Novel Label Trials
Target-Fixated Novel Label Trials
 |
These are the critical trials. Children tended to fixate both the novel target (blick) and the known distractor (kite) before hearing the novel label (“blick”). However, after hearing this novel label, children systematically switched gaze back to the known object distractor (kite), rejected it, and returned gaze to the novel target (blick) (a “double-check”). Reaction time to point suggests that it is the rejection of the known object distractor (kite), and not information about the novel target (blick), that predicts childrens’ rate to map a novel label to a novel object. Once the child has decided to reject the known object distractor (kite) he quickly shifts his gaze back to the novel target (blick) and points.
|
|